Cracking a FAANG interview is a daunting challenge – even for seasoned professionals. Google and Meta (formerly Facebook) are known for rigorous hiring processes that test everything from coding prowess to cultural fit. This comprehensive guide will walk you through FAANG interview prep tailored for mid-to-senior level software engineering roles (5+ years experience) in the US. We’ll cover what top-tier candidates need to know about each interview stage – behavioral, technical coding, system design, and role-fit – with an emphasis on Google and Meta’s processes. Along the way, we’ll highlight search-friendly tips (think “Google interview questions” and “Meta interview guide”) to ensure you’re prepared to land an offer at these tech giants.
Both Google and Meta follow multi-stage interview processes with several rounds designed to evaluate different competencies. While there are similarities, key differences exist in the number of interviews and focus areas at each company. The table below compares the typical interview stages for a software engineering candidate (mid-level) at Google and Meta:
Interview Stage | (SWE Roles) | Meta (Facebook SWE Roles) |
Resume & Application | Resume & cover letter screening (very selective – ~90% fail to pass this step). Referrals can boost visibility. | Resume screening (also ~90% don’t advance). Ensure your experience aligns with the role to get past this highly competitive filter. |
Recruiter Phone Screen | Typically a brief introductory call. Google often combines this with scheduling/logistics; not always a formal interview. | Yes – 1 HR screen. Recruiter verifies your background and motivation (e.g. “Tell me about yourself” , “Why Meta?” ). Basic behavioral fit is assessed. |
Technical Phone Screen | Yes – 1–2 technical screens. 30–60 min coding interviews via Google Meet. Focus on data structures/algorithms; solve problems in a shared Google Doc (no IDE). Some behavioral questions (e.g. “Why Google?” ) may appear. | Yes – 1–2 technical screens. 45 min coding interviews (often on CoderPad). Primarily data structures/algorithms, sometimes with a few behavioral questions at the start. |
Onsite “Loop” Interviews | Yes – 4–6 interviews onsite (or virtual onsite). Typically includes 3 coding interviews and 1–2 system design interviews for experienced candidates. Each is ~45 min. Note: Non-manager roles usually don’t have a dedicated behavioral-only interview, but expect some behavioral questions in each interview. | Yes – 4–5 interviews onsite . Typically 2 coding interviews, 1–2 design interviews (system or product design depending on background), and 1 “Getting to Know You” behavioral interview. Each about 45 min. A lunch with a team member (non-evaluative) is often included. |
Post-Interview Process | Interviewers submit feedback, then a hiring committee reviews your packet. If approved, you enter team matching discussions with potential managers. Finally, senior leadership reviews and an offer is extended. This thorough process means Google’s hiring timeline can exceed 2 months. | After interviews, a candidate review meeting evaluates your performance. Interviewers debate “hire” vs “no hire” recommendations. If approved, the packet goes to a hiring committee of senior Meta leaders for final sign-off. Team matching typically happens around this stage. Meta’s process averages 4–8 weeks from start to finish. |
Key Differences: Google’s process is slightly longer and more centralized – a formal hiring committee must recommend hire/no-hire, and team matching is a distinct step. Meta’s process is transparent, with recruiters guiding candidates and even sharing prep resources early on. Meta always includes a dedicated behavioral interview (“Getting to Know You”), whereas Google integrates behavioral evaluation into various rounds (and sometimes a separate “Googliness” chat, especially for leadership roles). Both companies are extremely selective, so thorough preparation is essential.
At the mid-senior level, behavioral interviews carry significant weight. Companies want to see not just what you’ve done, but how you collaborate, lead, and align with their culture. Google and Meta alike probe for attributes like teamwork, leadership, problem-solving approach, and adaptability.
Google: Expect behavioral questions interspersed throughout interviews, evaluating “Googleyness” (cultural fit) and leadership. Google defines specific attributes such as General Cognitive Ability (GCA), Role-Related Knowledge (RRK), Leadership (emergent leadership), and Googleyness (culture fit). For example, you might be asked how you navigated ambiguity or took initiative, to see if you embody Google’s values. Though Google’s interviewers may focus slightly less on behavioral questions than other FAANG companies, you should still prepare concise stories for common themes.
Meta: Meta places strong emphasis on culture and teamwork through its “Getting to Know You” interview. They look for well-rounded engineers who work well in a fast-paced, ambiguous environment. Key traits Meta evaluates include conflict resolution, growth mindset, dealing with ambiguity, perseverance, and communication. Interviewers will expect you to share stories demonstrating autonomy, ownership, and swift decision-making (“move fast” mentality). Meta’s culture is bottom-up, so be ready to discuss how you drove projects or handled uncertain situations in your past roles.
Common Behavioral Questions (Examples):
“Tell me about the greatest accomplishment of your career.”
“Describe a time you struggled to work with a difficult colleague or had to resolve a team conflict.”
“Tell me about a time you had to step up and take responsibility for a project’s success.”
“Give an example of a constructive feedback you received and how you responded.”
“Why Google?” or “Why Meta?”
When answering behavioral questions, use the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) to structure your stories. Focus on outcomes and impact – as an experienced candidate, highlight how your actions made a difference.
Coding interviews are a core component of both Google and Meta’s hiring process. Even with 5+ years of experience, you will be rigorously tested on data structures and algorithms.
How to Excel in Coding Rounds:
Master the Fundamentals: Arrays, linked lists, stacks, queues, trees, graphs, tries, dynamic programming, sorting, searching, etc.
Write Clean, Efficient Code: Optimize for correctness, readability, and performance.
Think Aloud and Structured: Explain your thought process clearly.
Practice Under Interview Conditions: Use a plain editor or whiteboard; Meta uses CoderPad, Google uses Docs without auto-complete.
Test and Edge Cases: Always run through sample inputs.
For candidates with 5+ years of experience, system design interviews become a major focus.
How to Approach System Design Problems:
Clarify Requirements: Ask scope-defining questions.
High-Level Architecture First: Identify core modules and data flow.
Discuss Trade-offs and Choices: CAP theorem, SQL vs NoSQL, scalability, consistency vs availability.
Incorporate Your Experience: Share relevant system design insights.
Cover Edge Cases and Evolution: Plan for scale, redundancy, and failure handling.
Google: Role-Related Knowledge (RRK) and team matching ensure your expertise fits the role.
Meta: Team-fit is emphasized in the “Getting to Know You” round and discussions with potential managers.
Tips: Know the job description, show genuine interest, ask thoughtful questions, and present yourself as a collaborative, adaptable team player.
DSA Practice: LeetCode, HackerRank, CodeSignal.
System Design Study: Grokking the System Design Interview, System Design Primer.
Behavioral Prep: STAR stories aligned to company values.
Mock Interviews: Simulate with peers or services.
Official Resources: Google and Meta provide prep guides.
Logistics: Prepare your environment, tech setup, and mindset.
Landing a job at Google or Meta is highly competitive, but with the right preparation, mid- and senior-level professionals can succeed. Focus on coding proficiency, system design acumen, and communication of your experience. Prepare smartly and strategically, and you’ll be well-equipped to crack these interviews.